[Comparison of the microdilution method (PASCO), the Etest and disc-diffusion in streptococcus pneumoniae antibiotic susceptibility testing].

Imagen de Magaly Martinez-Ferrer
PDF versionPDF version
Título[Comparison of the microdilution method (PASCO), the Etest and disc-diffusion in streptococcus pneumoniae antibiotic susceptibility testing].
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication1998
AutoresOliver, A, Tarragó, D, Martinez-Ferrer, M, Loza, E, Cantón, R, Baquero, F
JournalRev Esp Quimioter
Volume11
Issue4
Pagination344-8
Date Published1998 Dec
ISSN0214-3429
Palabras claveAnti-Bacterial Agents, Culture Media, Diffusion, Indicator Dilution Techniques, microbial sensitivity tests, Streptococcus pneumoniae
Abstract

MIC values and inhibition zone diameters for penicillin, cefotaxime, and erythromycin where determined in 75 consecutive Streptococcus pneumoniae blood isolates by microdilution (PASCO), disc-diffusion and Etest. Using the Etest, 40% and 29.3% of the isolates showed low- or high-level resistance to penicillin and erythromycin respectively, whereas 9.3% were intermediate to cefotaxime. No high-level resistance to cefotaxime was found. No errors were found with the comparison of penicillin and cefotaxime results by microdilution and Etest, with just 2 (2.7%) and 3 (4%) minor errors appearing respectively. On the other hand, when comparing penicillin susceptibility results by disc-diffusion (1 mg oxacillin disc) and Etest, 6 (8%) major errors and 18 (24%) minor errors were found.

Alternate JournalRev Esp Quimioter
PubMed ID9990148