Ciliary neurotrophic factor and fibroblast growth factor increase the speed and number of regenerating axons after optic nerve injury in adult Rana pipiens.

Jonathan M Blagburn's picture
PDF versionPDF version
TitleCiliary neurotrophic factor and fibroblast growth factor increase the speed and number of regenerating axons after optic nerve injury in adult Rana pipiens.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsVega-Meléndez, GS, Blagburn, J, Blanco, RE
JournalJ Neurosci Res
Volume92
Issue1
Pagination13-23
Date Published2014 Jan
ISSN1097-4547
KeywordsAnimals, Axons, Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor, Fibroblast Growth Factors, Nerve Crush, Nerve Regeneration, Optic Nerve Injuries, Rana pipiens
Abstract

Neurotrophins such as ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) play important roles in neuronal survival and in axonal outgrowth during development. However, whether they can modulate regeneration after optic nerve injury in the adult animal is less clear. The present study investigates the effects of application of these neurotrophic factors on the speed, number, and distribution of regenerating axons in the frog Rana pipiens after optic nerve crush. Optic nerves were crushed and the factors, or phosphate-buffered saline, were applied to the stump or intraocularly. The nerves were examined at different times after axotomy, using anterograde labeling with biotin dextran amine and antibody against growth-associated protein 43. We measured the length, number, and distribution of axons projecting beyond the lesion site. Untreated regenerating axons show an increase in elongation rate over 3 weeks. CNTF more than doubles this rate, FGF-2 increases it, and BDNF has little effect. In contrast, the numbers of regenerating axons that have reached 200 μm at 2 weeks were more than doubled by FGF-2, increased by CNTF, and barely affected by BDNF. The regenerating axons were preferentially distributed in the periphery of the nerve; although the numbers of axons were increased by neurotrophic factor application, this overall distribution was substantially unaffected.

DOI10.1002/jnr.23303
Alternate JournalJ. Neurosci. Res.
PubMed ID24166589
PubMed Central IDPMC4134876
Grant ListG12 MD007600 / MD / NIMHD NIH HHS / United States
G12RR03051 / RR / NCRR NIH HHS / United States
GM093869 / GM / NIGMS NIH HHS / United States
R25 GM061838 / GM / NIGMS NIH HHS / United States
R25GM061838 / GM / NIGMS NIH HHS / United States
SC1 NS081726 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
SC1NS081726 / NS / NINDS NIH HHS / United States
SC3 GM093869 / GM / NIGMS NIH HHS / United States